Thermodynamics-Informed Input Reparameterization for Neural Prediction of Real-Fluid Thermodynamic Properties in Supercritical Combustion

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the aipentium editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为大语言模型、生成式AI、ChatGPT相关技术、计算机视觉、深度学习等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Real-fluid thermodynamic property evaluation is a major computational cost in supercritical combustion simulations. In the enthalpy-based pressure-correction formulation, the closure evaluates temperature T, density $ρ$, and compressibility coefficient $ψ$ from the solver state (h,p,Y) through enthalpy-temperature inversion and repeated real-fluid equation-of-state evaluations. Neural-network surrogates offer fixed-cost inference, but direct mapping from (h,p,Y) to $(T,ρ,ψ)$ must capture the enthalpy-temperature relation and non-ideal equation-of-state response, resulting in a complex regression problem. This work introduces a thermodynamics-informed input reparameterization strategy, termed target-aligned input reparameterization (TAIR). TAIR replaces the raw enthalpy coordinate of each property network with a target-matched thermodynamic coordinate: the temperature network uses a temperature estimate obtained by inverting a constant-$c_p$ ideal-gas mixture enthalpy approximation, whereas the density and compressibility networks use an ideal-gas density estimate. These algebraic transformations use only solver-available variables and species constants, guiding the networks to learn real-fluid departures from ideal-gas baselines rather than reconstructing the full closure from raw enthalpy. The method is assessed using supercritical methane-oxygen counterflow flame data against a raw-input baseline and target-inconsistent cross-reparameterization controls. TAIR reduces held-out RMSE by factors of about 1.5, 2.0, and 7.5 for T, $ρ$, and $ψ$, respectively. For an unseen strain-rate flame within the augmented thermodynamic envelope, the corresponding factors are 3.6, 14.5, and 6.0. The target-inconsistent controls perform worse, indicating that the gains arise from thermodynamically matched input design rather than generic preprocessing.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments