TELLER: Dual-Path Iterative Preference Optimization for Table Entity Linking

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the aipentium editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为大语言模型、生成式AI、ChatGPT相关技术、计算机视觉、深度学习等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Entity linking in tables matches short and ambiguous cell mentions to their corresponding knowledge-base entities. Existing approaches typically rely on data preprocessing pipelines that retain either compact or extensive table content as contextual evidence, and then formulate entity linking as a language generation task for instruction-tuned models; recent systems further incorporate explicit reasoning to disambiguate challenging mentions. However, their training supervision is usually static: fixed preference data cannot adapt to the residual errors of an evolving model, while variations in reasoning length can bias sequence-level preference learning. To address these limitations, we present TELLER: Table Entity Linking through Learning from Errors and Reasoning. We first retrieve and rank Wikidata candidates and retain reduced table evidence in the prompt. The direct-answer path applies iterative direct preference optimization and refreshes its preference data with residual errors from the updated model. The reasoning path uses filtered and compressed chain-of-thought rationales for supervised fine-tuning, followed by our iterative length-normalized regularized preference optimization. On the TableInstruct entity-linking subset, the direct-answer path improves accuracy from 94.35\% to 94.50\%; on the MammoTab V2 evaluation set, it improves accuracy from 87.59\% to 88.20\%. The reasoning path improves accuracy from 92.90\% to 92.95\% on TableInstruct and from 79.09\% to 81.85\% on MammoTab V2, while maintaining high rates of complete reasoning generation. These results show that iterative preference learning benefits both concise entity prediction and explicit reasoning.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments