RDQ: Residual Distribution Quantization for Large Language Models

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the aipentium editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为大语言模型、生成式AI、ChatGPT相关技术、计算机视觉、深度学习等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Post-training quantization (PTQ) of large language models degrades sharply below 4-bit precision. We identify the root cause as residual stream distributional drift: quantization noise injected at each transformer layer accumulates in the shared residual representation, causing KL divergence from the FP16 baseline to grow super-linearly with depth (Pearson r=0.999 with log-perplexity, p<0.001, confirmed across all tested methods and bit-widths). We discover that 84% of LLaMA-3-8B layers exhibit non-Gaussian residual distributions (KS test, p<=0.05), and that per-layer residual stream variance grows 6,548x across depth. We propose RDQ (Residual Distribution Quantization), a PTQ framework whose central contribution is Cascaded Error Compensation (CEC): a sequential calibration procedure that captures the actual drifted activations each layer receives (computed by running calibration data through already-quantized upstream layers) and fits per-channel AWQ-style scales against those drifted inputs, with scales folded into preceding RMSNorm weights for exact mathematical equivalence at zero inference overhead. RDQ achieves state-of-the-art results on all three tested architectures: LLaMA-3-8B: 7.55 / 5.62 PPL (W3/W4); Qwen-2.5-7B: 7.46 / 6.38 PPL; Mistral-7B: 6.88 / 5.73 PPL. RDQ beats the best published baseline (LeanQuant/SpinQuant) at every model and bit-width combination, with gains up to -46.4% vs. RTN at W3A16 on LLaMA-3-8B. All output is standard group-128 asymmetric quantization, deployable on Qualcomm AIMET, GGUF, and any standard inference stack at zero runtime overhead.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments