Joint Affine Spectral Shaping: Coupling Weight and Bias Updates Beyond Weight-Only Muon

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the aipentium editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为大语言模型、生成式AI、ChatGPT相关技术、计算机视觉、深度学习等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Matrix spectral optimizers reshape weight-update spectra but usually delegate vector-valued biases to a separate optimizer. We study whether this separation is neutral. We formulate each affine layer as a joint momentum matrix $A=[M_W,αm_b]$ and apply a capped regularized-inverse spectral map to the complete matrix, producing both the weight and physical bias updates. A strict five-seed ablation on a four-layer BERT-mini trained from scratch on IMDb compares exact-SVD Muon, weight-only inverse shaping, affine-probe inverse shaping, and the proposed joint regularized inverse (JRI). Weight-only inverse shaping raises validation-loss-selected test accuracy from $84.903\pm0.242\%$ to $85.562\pm0.308\%$ and lowers selected test loss from $0.3479$ to $0.3345$. Allowing bias to alter the joint SVD while retaining an independent Adam bias update does not improve over weight-only inverse shaping. Using the transformed bias jointly raises selected test accuracy to $85.738\pm0.180\%$ and lowers test loss to $0.3291$, with all five seeds improving relative to the probe baseline. During the peak-performance window, JRI preserves the eligible weight-update norm while reducing the bias-update norm from $0.02095$ to $0.00301$, lowers boundary-function share from $86.58\%$ to $78.97\%$, and changes the cosine between weight-induced boundary motion and explicit bias from $+0.030$ to $-0.137$. An independent 22-seed replication yields $85.743\pm0.203\%$ selected test accuracy. These results identify joint affine spectral allocation as a small but consistent extension to weight-only spectral optimization.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments