Imputation-free transformer learning enables robust Alzheimer's disease prediction and calibrated uncertainty quantification across heterogeneous clinical cohorts

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the aipentium editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为大语言模型、生成式AI、ChatGPT相关技术、计算机视觉、深度学习等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Accurate diagnostic classification and disease-severity prediction for Alzheimer's disease are hampered by the incompleteness and heterogeneity of real-world clinical data. Left unaddressed, these barriers prevent reliable disease modelling and hinder effective clinical evaluation. Conventional imputation strategies introduce systematic bias, distort inter-feature relationships, and yield overconfident predictions, limitations especially consequential in diagnostic settings. Here, we propose NITROGEN, an imputation-free transformer that jointly models within-patient feature dependencies and between-patient relational structure through masked and intersample attention, enabling robust multimodal learning directly from partially observed records. We trained NITROGEN on ADNI (N=7858 scans), and evaluated it on two independent cohorts: OASIS-3 (N=2675 scans) and AIBL (N=1286 scans). Across cohorts and diagnostic and cognitive score prediction tasks, NITROGEN showed robust calibration and uncertainty quantification advantages over tree-based ensemble methods, while maintaining competitive discriminative performance. Cross-cohort and cross-method analyses identified cortical thickness in the temporal pole, age, and APOE genotype as important, though not individually sufficient, features for AD classification. We further introduced a modality-aware uncertainty adjustment that augments predictive uncertainty proportionally to the importance of absent modalities, enabling calibrated confidence when diagnostic information is unavailable. Together, our results show that imputation-free attention learning preserved meaningful discrimination under cohort shift, revealing expected degradation on more distributionally different cohorts, and demonstrate that evaluating models along calibration, interpretability, and cross-cohort reliability, not accuracy alone, is essential for clinical deployment.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments