“Hey Grok, You Tell Me”: How Public AI Verdicts Shape Creators’ Affective Responses and Coping on Social Media

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the aipentium editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为大语言模型、生成式AI、ChatGPT相关技术、计算机视觉、深度学习等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Public verification on social media is undergoing a fundamental shift as users increasingly invoke generative AI to publicly evaluate contested claims. To inform AI-integrated platform design and governance, this study investigates audience-invoked AI verdicts where users tag AI assistants like Grok to publicly validate or refute a creator’s claims. While these AI verdicts may support accuracy, they also operate as socially visible evaluations that can validate or undermine creators in front of an audience. Drawing on the Affective Response Model and coping theory, this study examines how affirming versus contradicting public AI verdicts shape creators’ induced affective states and coping intentions. We will test a 2×2 online experiment manipulating verdict valence and a visibility level, and assess whether higher visibility amplifies the effect of verdict valence on creators’ evaluations.

Links and sources

Comments