Does Mapping Non-Maximal Probabilities to GMM Components Matter for S-JEPA Encoder Representations?

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the aipentium editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为大语言模型、生成式AI、ChatGPT相关技术、计算机视觉、深度学习等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

S-JEPA uses soft Gaussian mixture model (GMM) posteriors instead of hard cluster labels to preserve uncertainty. It remains unclear whether the probability values alone are sufficient, or whether it also matters which GMM components receive the non-maximal probabilities. We test this with two matched controls. FIXED-RANDPERM keeps the top-1 component and probability together with the multiset of non-maximal probability values, but reassigns those non-maximal values using a mapping fixed for each physical frame. UNIFORM-TAIL keeps the top-1 component, its probability, and total non-maximal mass but distributes that mass uniformly. Across three independent seeds, REAL SOFT outperforms both controls on two frozen Encoder readouts. It provides better recovery of the original GMM tail and greater accessibility of spectral dynamics over short time scales after controlling for the complete spectrum of the current frame. In two exposure experiments, both readouts improved overall as more frames retained the original mapping. We also descriptively follow one Phase 2 trajectory after the switch to the online GMM. These results show that the numerical probability structure of the soft target does not fully determine the learned Encoder representation. The mapping of non-maximal probabilities to GMM components also matters.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments