Discovering Dual-Origin Slow Wind from Solar Orbiter with Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the aipentium editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为大语言模型、生成式AI、ChatGPT相关技术、计算机视觉、深度学习等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Whether the slow solar wind originates from one coronal source or two distinct channels remains a central open question in heliophysics. Resolving this requires unsupervised separation of two populations that arrive at nearly the same bulk speed and differ mainly in heavy-ion composition. We present Solar-CDC, a self-supervised contrastive deep clustering (CDC) framework that maps plasma observables to a latent space via a Transformer encoder, optimizes a triplet margin loss, and updates pseudo-labels via $k$-means. Theoretically, we prove that neighborhood-preserving embeddings such as t-SNE and UMAP are fundamentally constrained. Preserving the neighbor graph leaves the cross-cluster cut fraction unchanged, and preserving all but a fraction $\varepsilon$ of its links moves that fraction by at most $\varepsilon$. Neither bound depends on the target dimension. A margin objective rewrites the graph and drives the cut fraction to zero. Empirically, on 30,602 Solar Orbiter observations, thirty combinations of dimensionality reduction and clustering peak at a silhouette of $0.454$, whereas Solar-CDC reaches $0.869$. Escaping the geometric bound alone does not guarantee physical validity: TriMap also optimizes triplets and reaches $0.824$, yet its clusters score below chance against the published composition taxonomy. Solar-CDC instead recovers clusters with mean charge-state ratios of $0.080$, $0.160$, and $0.400$, placing the intermediate population inside the window associated with coronal-hole boundaries. Even when the defining charge-state ratio is withheld from the inputs entirely, the model still recovers the taxonomy defined on it. Solar-CDC thus connects self-supervised representation learning to coronal source diagnostics. Importantly, a learning loss recovers physical populations only when driven by dynamically updated physically-aware clusters rather than distances.

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments