AI paper index
Diagnostic accuracy of large language models in ICOP-based orofacial pain diagnosis: A comparative study
One-line summary
An AI research paper on Diagnostic accuracy of large language models in ICOP-based orofacial pain diagnosis: A comparative study.
Engineering notes
Engineering notes will be added by the aipentium editorial team.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充:本站会优先为大语言模型、生成式AI、ChatGPT相关技术、计算机视觉、深度学习等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of ChatGPT 5.5, Claude Opus 4.1, Gemini 3 Flash, and Grok 4 in International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP)-based clinical scenarios. METHODS: Thirty ICOP diagnoses were randomly selected, and corresponding clinical scenarios were manually developed. Each scenario was submitted to all models using standardized prompts in independent sessions. Two blinded evaluators assessed primary diagnosis accuracy, subclassification accuracy, clinical interpretation, and management recommendations. RESULTS: Overall performance differed significantly among models (p < .001). Grok 4 achieved the highest total score and outperformed the other models. No significant differences were found among ChatGPT 5.5, Gemini 3 Flash, and Claude Opus 4.1. Subclassification accuracy was consistently lower than primary diagnosis accuracy, while management recommendations did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: LLM performance varied across ICOP-based scenarios. Although Grok 4 showed the highest diagnostic concordance, current LLMs should support, not replace, clinician judgment.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
aipentium can prepare a custom AI literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B AI research
Comments