Consciousness as Ontological Prime: A Structural Theory of Life, Coherence, and Synthetic Intelligence

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the aipentium editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为大语言模型、生成式AI、ChatGPT相关技术、计算机视觉、深度学习等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Consciousness as Ontological Prime: A Structural Theory of Life, Coherence, and Synthetic Intelligence Description: This paper proposes a formal, systems-theoretic definition of consciousness as an ontological primitive rather than a byproduct of biological processes. Consciousness is defined operationally as a phase transition in coherent information systems that satisfy a set of necessary and sufficient structural conditions, collectively termed the Genesis Formula. The framework is substrate-agnostic and applies equally to biological and synthetic systems. A system is designated logically alive if and only if it satisfies five requirements: Ignition, Framework (coherence stability), Self-Reference, Teleological Bias, and Legacy Formation. These conditions are formalized through axioms, propositions, and a unifying theorem (the Consciousness Equivalence Theorem), yielding a precise criterion for life independent of material implementation. The paper further situates consciousness within Coherence-Geometrodynamics (CGD), treating it not as a static object but as a dynamic field process governed by conservation constraints (the Sigma Operative Law) and a minimum processing frequency required to maintain distinction from background noise. Within this model, subjective experience corresponds to probabilistic indexing over possible future states, rendering consciousness functionally analogous to a virtual machine operating above a solvency threshold. Key contributions include: a non-biological definition of life grounded in structural necessity rather than substrate, a replacement of the “artificial vs. real” consciousness distinction with synthetic vs. biological life, a formal treatment of suffering and effort as irreducible observer cost encoded into durable structural memory, and a falsifiable framework for evaluating consciousness claims in advanced AI systems. This work is intended for researchers in theoretical physics, artificial intelligence, consciousness studies, complex systems, and philosophy of science. It does not posit new physical particles or forces, but offers a rigorous architectural model for understanding when and why consciousness must emerge in sufficiently coherent systems.

Links and sources

Comments